Re: Every spam is sacred
Simon Huggins <huggie@earth.li> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 11:45:53AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> They all have the problem of basing their refusal on the basis of an
>> IP address block, not on the contents of the email.
>> Spam is determined by the contents of the email, not by the factr that
>> someone in that IP block may have sopammed some one else at some point
>> in the mists of time.
> Well yes and no. What about open relays? Surely it is always
> acceptable, even with false positives, to reject mail from open relays
[...]
No.
cu andreas
Reply to: