Wow, the last thing I expected was people to have a problem with the name :) Well I'm open to other suggestions if necessary. I think its a good virtual package name in that it almost certainly won't conflict with any actual package's name. * Richard Braakman (dark@xs4all.nl) wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:37:54PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote: > > All the automake packages will provide the virtual package > > automaken (in the same spirit as emacsen) if you need to depend on any > > version of automake. > > I don't understand how you get "automaken". emacs -> emacsen is a > parallel to ox -> oxen. I don't think English has any "-ake" words > that become "-aken" in the plural. > > There is a possible parallel with "take" -> "taken", but that would > make automaken an adjective. ("This package is automaken, but it > doesn't work with the latest version.") > Is that what you mean? > > Richard Braakman > > -- Eric Dorland <dorland@lords.com> ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com 1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C 2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ G e h! r- y+ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgphZh3s2j7Fo.pgp
Description: PGP signature