On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:24:56PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > > You can also remove files so PAM will fall back to using /etc/pam.d/other > which you can fill with standard settings. wouldn't pam_stack be a better option then that? or does pam_stack suck? -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
Attachment:
pgpXNu0OrBJji.pgp
Description: PGP signature