Re: split desktop-base package
On Sat, 2009-08-22 at 11:18 +0200, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Yeah, sorry I missed that (I thought qt used that too, and missed it was
> a gtk stuff). Loïc seems to have added it at one time. For the Xfce pov,
> I don't need it, I already recommends librsvg-common in needing
> packages, and could upgrade that to Depends if really needed. Not sure
> about GNOME and other stuff, but I'm not sure it really belongs in
> desktop-base.
>
> Loïc, Josselin, what do you think?
I think keeping desktop-base as a single source package, and providing
separate binary packages for each desktop when deps are required is the
way to go.
See you,
--
Gustavo Noronha Silva <kov@debian.org>
Debian
Reply to: