Re: split desktop-base package
On 2009-08-22, Yves-Alexis Perez <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> On sam, 2009-08-22 at 06:37 +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> > Sorry, I really fail to see the need :)
>> If desktop-base needed for the sake of kde to (indirectly) depend on libq=
>> would that be acceptable for you ?=20
> No. But again, I don't see why that would need to be under the
> desktop-base umbrella. Create whatever desktop-base-kde you need, but
> that doesn't need to have a desktop-base agreement, afaik.
desktop-base pulls in gtk thru librsvg-common.