On sam, 2009-08-22 at 09:09 +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: > > No. But again, I don't see why that would need to be under the > > desktop-base umbrella. Create whatever desktop-base-kde you need, > but > > that doesn't need to have a desktop-base agreement, afaik. > > desktop-base pulls in gtk thru librsvg-common. Yeah, sorry I missed that (I thought qt used that too, and missed it was a gtk stuff). Loïc seems to have added it at one time. For the Xfce pov, I don't need it, I already recommends librsvg-common in needing packages, and could upgrade that to Depends if really needed. Not sure about GNOME and other stuff, but I'm not sure it really belongs in desktop-base. Loïc, Josselin, what do you think? Cheers, -- Yves-Alexis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part