[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: packaging control field Uploaders



Quoting Paul Wise (2021-09-27 01:53:41)
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2021 at 10:14 AM Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> 
> > In PureOS we are currently discussing how to most sensibly handle
> > Uploaders field when forking packages.
> 
> I think the right way to deal with the Uploaders field in any
> situation is to pretend we live in a world where we have a single
> Maintainers field instead of Maintainer+Uploaders. The Uploaders field
> is a historical wart that really should never have been invented in
> the first place.
> 
> > What do others think?
> 
> Translating the suggested pretending to the real world, I would say
> one of two options:
> 
> if you rename Maintainer to Original-Maintainer then also rename
> Uploaders to Original-Uploaders.
> 
> if you replace Maintainer then drop or replace Uploaders.

Fair enough - I have updated 
https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Guidelines#Packages to have 
Uploaders field follow same logic as Maintainer field.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: