On Sun, 2017-07-30 at 00:14 +0800, Felix Yan wrote: > Hardware side, we focus on x86_64, mips64el and alpha. That is interesting, I thought alpha was a dead architecture. Also, your census page mentions armhf but not either of mips64el or alpha. If alpha wasn't a typo for armhf, then your alpha engineers might want to get involved in the Debian alpha port, which is no longer a release architecture but still worked on by some enthusiasts. https://www.ports.debian.org/ https://www.debian.org/ports/alpha/ https://lists.debian.org/debian-alpha/ https://buildd.debian.org/status/architecture.php?a=alpha&suite=sid > Currently there is an effort going on to submit DDE packages to Debian Excellent. > The entries I listed are for latest community edition, we also have a > professional version (based on jessie) for enterprises and I thought it > would be confusing to list them together. Please correct me if this was > meant to list all apt repos unconditionally. Yeah, it is meant to list all the apt repositories. You can separate the different editions with comments. Currently this is only used to list patches from derivatives on the PTS. There are also some checks of the sources.list and package information. https://wiki.debian.org/Derivatives/Integration#Patches http://deriv.debian.net/Deepin/check-sources-list http://deriv.debian.net/Deepin/check-package-list The warnings in the last one are caused by differences in the package+version list between the deb and deb-src entries. Please note that differences due to dbgsym packages are a bug in the census scripts that I need to work on during DebConf. http://deriv.debian.net/Deepin/diff_source_packages http://deriv.debian.net/Deepin/diff_binary_packages > Since it's an English page I guess the following feed would be better: > > https://www.deepin.org/en/feed/ There are several non-English derivatives posting to the planet so it isn't mandatory to use English, but since English is probably read by more of the audience and Deepin has an English blog too, I've updated the feed URL to the English one. > Already a frequenter :) > We are planning to, and thanks for the info. Excellent. > Some of the issues are not yet answered since I still have to > investigate or contact others to fix. Many thanks for the detailed > instructions! Ok, no worries :) -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part