Re: Ubuntu Bug Fixing Initiatives
On 12.08.2012 08:13, Charles Plessy wrote:
> for the debhelper-but-no-misc-depends I am not sure how much useful it is to
> send patches. If the maintainers ignored the warning, they will not be
> interested by the patch. If the reason for not having misc-depends is that
> there was no upload for a long time, then the patch will not be enough to
> justify a new upload.
> How about no-homepage-field instead ? This lets the users exercise with the
> procedures of sending patches, and has some added value, as some homepages are
> tricky to find.
Great idea. I'll add it to the list.
On a separate note, we are holding Ubuntu Developer Week again in two
weeks, which is a series of IRC tutorials, talks and sessions and I was
wondering if it would make sense for somebody to demonstrate how to take
a formerly neglected package, bring it up to recent standards and submit
the patch for inclusion. Do you think that'd make sense?
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek/Timetable still has some
Have a great day,
Get involved in Ubuntu development! developer.ubuntu.com/packaging
And follow @ubuntudev on identi.ca/twitter.com/facebook.com/gplus.to