Re: release-info package naming
Hi Matt (2011.06.02_12:09:11_+0200)
> For example, I wouldn't call it distrostatus or distroreleases the like,
> because it could very well be useful to add other information to it in the
> future. The right name really depends on the long-term intent of the
The short term intent of it is to get rid of all the hardcoding of
release names in packages. Having to backport (mostly
developer-oriented) packages so that they refer to the current
development release by default is just silly.
As to longer term goals: Benjamin?
H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127