On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 02:58:48PM -0500, Drew Scott Daniels wrote: > unstable(new pkg)---> testing1---> stable1 ---> revisions1 (r1...) > | > |-> unstable ---> testing2 ---> stable2 ---> revisions2 > | > |-> unstable ---> testing3 > | > |-> unstable That's not a complete example. Also possible is something like: unstable (1) -> testing | `-> unstable (2) -> testing -> stable | | | | | | | `-> proposed-updates (2s1) -> stable | | | | | `-> (2t1) testing-proposed-updates -> testing | | | `-> unstable (2.1) -> testing | `-> unstable (3) Where bugs are fixed in 2t1 and 2s1 that aren't fixed in 2.1, and bugs were fixed in 2.1 that aren't fixed in 3. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Dear Anthony Towns: [...] Congratulations -- you are now certified as a Red Hat Certified Engineer!''
Description: PGP signature