Bug#62490: marked as done (debbugs: control logs not accurate)
Your message dated Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:01:14 +0000
with message-id <20030320150114.GA4807@riva.ucam.org>
and subject line multiple copies of this bug...
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Apr 2000 20:45:49 +0000
Received: (qmail 20161 invoked from network); 16 Apr 2000 20:45:49 -0000
Received: from smtp-rt-5.wanadoo.fr (HELO bassia.wanadoo.fr) (@193.252.19.159)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 16 Apr 2000 20:45:49 -0000
Received: from villosa.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.122) by bassia.wanadoo.fr; 16 Apr 2000 22:45:47 +0200
Received: from bylbo.nowhere.earth (62.161.77.57) by villosa.wanadoo.fr; 16 Apr 2000 22:45:47 +0200
Received: from dwitch by bylbo.nowhere.earth with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 12gxnN-0002fm-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 Apr 2000 00:45:37 +0200
From: Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <14586.17041.478508.52940@bylbo.nowhere.earth>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 00:45:37 +0200 (CEST)
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: debbugs: reassign log not accurate
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid
User-Agent: EMIKO/1.13.9 (Euglena tripteris) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 8) (Bryce Canyon) (i386-debian-linux)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Package: debbugs
Version: In use on bugs.d.o on 00-03-17
It seems the original package on which the bug was logged is not
accurate:
> reassign 56886 boot-floppies
Bug#56886: boot problems
Bug reassigned from package `boot-floppies' to `boot-floppies'.
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@altern.org> | Why make M$-Bill richer & richer ?
debian-email: <dirson@debian.org> | Support Debian GNU/Linux:
| Cheaper, more Powerful, more Stable !
http://www.altern.org/ydirson/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 62490-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Mar 2003 15:01:18 +0000
>From cjwatson@flatline.org.uk Thu Mar 20 09:01:17 2003
Return-path: <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com [194.73.73.81]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18w1Xh-0001SD-00; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:01:17 -0600
Received: from host81-132-174-158.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([81.132.174.158] helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by tungsten.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
id 18w1Xf-0000xE-00
for 62490-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:01:15 +0000
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
for 62490-done@bugs.debian.org
id 18w1Xe-0001GM-00; Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:01:14 +0000
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 15:01:14 +0000
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: 62490-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: multiple copies of this bug...
Message-ID: <20030320150114.GA4807@riva.ucam.org>
References: <20001007190839.A21811@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20001007190839.A21811@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: 62490-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 07:08:39PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> For the record, this is the same bug as #59731 or #62319.
As Josip said in the closing message for those bugs, messages to
control@bugs don't get processed multiple times any more. I think that
deals with this report too.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: