Re: ANNC: New Debbugs
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hmm. Interested idea. But perhaps those people should use reportbug or bug.
>
> Yes maybe. But sometime (even I had problems using bug and reportbug
> before I learnt the EMAIL env variable) such tools can be hard to use,
> at least for a novice. I have not looked at them for half a year or
> more but "back then" they was a bit hard.
Then file bugs on them to have them improved.
> Ok, but at least the initial reporter must be automatically subscribed to the bug
> in order to get all the information to the bts. If not, the reply-to header
> will not be set properly.
Why would the initial reporter always be concerned about everything that
occurs for a bug? And what does that have to do with setting reply-to?
Convince me properly.
Reply to: