RE: DAK, Debian versions, and SQL Alchemy versions
Many thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Marcin Kulisz [mailto:debian@kulisz.net]
Sent: 05 January 2012 13:13
To: debian-dak@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: DAK, Debian versions, and SQL Alchemy versions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/01/12 10:43, Brooke, Simon wrote:
sic
> So: should I start again, using just Squeeze and Squeeze-backports? What Debian version are people who are running production daks currently using?
My DAK is running on squeeze + backports (mainly for postgres) and I
suppose that all Debian infrastructure is running stable as well.
So I would say use squeeze + backports for postresql and that's it.
- --
|_|0|_| |
|_|_|0| "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam" |
|0|0|0| -------- kuLa --------- |
gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0xC100B4CA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPBaHDAAoJEOqHloDBALTKUbIIAIL7v9yYZ+y+T8bGf0cYhnrI
1s62OzS4ISL4bbwKpRh3hOBSjJGVfW+Fwrh9guEsCoJlp9nv5Nkl+fSUvb6JLj/I
0IUEZqiXDpEoAYhagKXu53fjYVZMbEi3ohRas176e6CeePUjke3SGkvfkY5d9oSw
JuGWzld3HzOU/WabjQHjxy0ruNdaqFnskDNvNZVx1kGlVsZe/Fh6dl3eZUwpP/Ln
83kY5w9gHekDarGbKQsUYpK9SLnb6EZ0CsU5EXMuWuQjuieuj6jM09HXu7fit3Ss
6rNLGsXEfjtlsAHw79mBzUXN/UXVUz6q0f6kzkYWMKccT4UmBEmNshTXzgy/aWY=
=ciM6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dak-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] 4F05A1C3.7070107@kulisz.net">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 4F05A1C3.7070107@kulisz.net
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
E-mail messages may contain viruses, worms, or other malicious code. By reading the message and opening any attachments, the recipient accepts full responsibility for taking protective action against such code. Henry Schein is not liable for any loss or damage arising from this message.
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee(s). Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorized.
Reply to: