[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DAK, Debian versions, and SQL Alchemy versions



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/01/12 10:43, Brooke, Simon wrote:
sic
> So: should I start again, using just Squeeze and Squeeze-backports? What Debian version are people who are running production daks currently using?

My DAK is running on squeeze + backports (mainly for postgres) and I
suppose that all Debian infrastructure is running stable as well.
So I would say use squeeze + backports for postresql and that's it.
- -- 

|_|0|_|                                          |
|_|_|0|         "Heghlu'Meh QaQ jajVam"          |
|0|0|0|         -------- kuLa ---------          |

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 0xC100B4CA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPBaHDAAoJEOqHloDBALTKUbIIAIL7v9yYZ+y+T8bGf0cYhnrI
1s62OzS4ISL4bbwKpRh3hOBSjJGVfW+Fwrh9guEsCoJlp9nv5Nkl+fSUvb6JLj/I
0IUEZqiXDpEoAYhagKXu53fjYVZMbEi3ohRas176e6CeePUjke3SGkvfkY5d9oSw
JuGWzld3HzOU/WabjQHjxy0ruNdaqFnskDNvNZVx1kGlVsZe/Fh6dl3eZUwpP/Ln
83kY5w9gHekDarGbKQsUYpK9SLnb6EZ0CsU5EXMuWuQjuieuj6jM09HXu7fit3Ss
6rNLGsXEfjtlsAHw79mBzUXN/UXVUz6q0f6kzkYWMKccT4UmBEmNshTXzgy/aWY=
=ciM6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: