|| On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:26:49 +0200 (CEST) || Andreas Tille <tillea@rki.de> wrote: at> doc/ at> cdd/ at> ... at> med/ at> ... at> ... at> which would fail in matching the logic above but a separation between cdd and at> projects would be to much, IMHO. An alternative to this suggestion would at> be to include a doc directory directly in each projects directory. This at> might be a good idea if we decide to build even the <cdd>-doc package together at> with the meta packages but currently I do not plan to realize this idea which at> comes sometimes into my mind. To me, the <cdd>-doc need be build together with the core package since it document a "picture" of the package and because of this should be release with it. Looks not so dificult merge it in each package and I think is the better thing to do. Possible, each maintainer can realize it in your package and you, me and someothers do it in core package. What you think? -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: otavio@debian.org UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house."
Attachment:
pgpfO5UTv427s.pgp
Description: PGP signature