On Sat, 26 Aug 2023 15:47:51 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 20:12, Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> wrote: > > I would very much prefer it if we can keep this conversation respectful, […] > > If you're frustrated, I understand that, but please can we take that > > off-list? > The perfect time to discuss "creative" alternative approaches was ~12 > years ago, when everybody else was discussing where to move towards. > It was perfectly acceptable to discuss it before the first CTTE vote. > It was still ok-ish before the second CTTE vote. In August 2023: […] That may well be true, but I think you missed smvc's point: > and hence interpreting attempts to propose yet another different and > incompatible layout (only and solely for the benefit of the hopelessly > broken dpkg tool) as sealioning is not disrespectful, on the contrary > it is the most charitable interpretation possible. What Simon is asking for, in my interpretation, is some form of civilised conversation; what you are delivering, as a direct reply to Simon's request, causes yet another major pain in my back. Please stop and reconsider how you communicate with your peers. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature