Re: Bug#1050001: Unwinding directory aliasing
I would very much prefer it if we can keep this conversation respectful,
because mediating between angry people is exhausting (and the more
spoons I have to put into that, the less effectively I can advocate for
the technical opinions that I think you and I mostly agree on, which I
assume is not what you want).
I'm keen to avoid the anti-pattern where a valid technical point gets
disregarded or even opposed because the way it was expressed puts other
project members on the defensive.
If you're frustrated, I understand that, but please can we take that
off-list?
On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 10:35:42 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Suse [...] tried [symlink farms similar to those that Ian proposes]
> for a few years, then had to backtrack and
> go the way everyone else successfully went instead, which quickly wrapped up as
> expected.
I alluded to that in a previous mail to this thread, but I don't have
first-hand knowledge of the specifics of how that went, and it sounds
as though you might. Do you have references that you can point us to?
(To the list or as private email for me to summarize on-list later,
whichever seems more appropriate.
Thanks,
smcv
Reply to: