Bug#1003653: Revision of removal of rename.ul from package util-linux

[Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org>]

Thanks for drafting this, Matthew!

I have a small suggestion here:

Matthew Vernon dijo [Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 04:47:17PM +0100]:
> Backwards-compatibility (and the lack of a compelling argument that
> util-linux's rename is significantly superior to the perl rename) means that
> /usr/bin/rename in Debian should remain the perl rename.

I'd prefer to read "that neither 'rename' implementation is superior
to the other", maybe even explaining that "they were designed out of
different needs and meet different criteria".

> The Technical Committee resolves that util-linux's rename should be shipped
> in a binary package build from src:util-linux. If this package Conflicts
                     ^built

> Matthew
> ps; my first TC resolution, please be gentle if I have the procedure wrong!

Thanks again!