[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1003653: Revision of removal of rename.ul from package util-linux

Hello Matthew,

On Thu 14 Apr 2022 at 04:47PM +01, Matthew Vernon wrote:

> ===Begin Resolution
> The Technical Committee resolves that util-linux's rename should be
> shipped in a binary package build from src:util-linux. If this package
> Conflicts with the rename package, then it should not contain any other
> binaries.
> The Technical Committee overrides the util-linux maintainer, and
> requires that this binary should be shipped as /usr/bin/rename.ul
> ===End Resolution
> A: Approve resolution, including override of util-linux maintainer
> B: Approve only first paragraph of resolution
> N: None of the above

I think that both of these involve overriding the maintainer, as the
restriction to not include any other binaries if the package Conflicts:
with bin:rename is also to override the maintainer?

> Matthew
> ps; my first TC resolution, please be gentle if I have the procedure wrong!

Thank you for coming up with this text.  Actually, the new procedure is
new to all of us; this is our first use of it.

In this case I believe you need to formally withdraw options A&B and
then propose another ballot.

Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: