Hello Matthew, On Thu 14 Apr 2022 at 04:47PM +01, Matthew Vernon wrote: > ===Begin Resolution > > The Technical Committee resolves that util-linux's rename should be > shipped in a binary package build from src:util-linux. If this package > Conflicts with the rename package, then it should not contain any other > binaries. > > The Technical Committee overrides the util-linux maintainer, and > requires that this binary should be shipped as /usr/bin/rename.ul > > ===End Resolution > > A: Approve resolution, including override of util-linux maintainer > B: Approve only first paragraph of resolution > N: None of the above I think that both of these involve overriding the maintainer, as the restriction to not include any other binaries if the package Conflicts: with bin:rename is also to override the maintainer? > Matthew > ps; my first TC resolution, please be gentle if I have the procedure wrong! Thank you for coming up with this text. Actually, the new procedure is new to all of us; this is our first use of it. In this case I believe you need to formally withdraw options A&B and then propose another ballot. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature