Bug#846002: blends-tasks must not be priority:important (was Re: Bug#846002: Lowering severity)

[Ole Streicher <olebole@debian.org>]

Hi Phil,

On 10.12.2016 12:06, Philip Hands wrote:
> Anyway, having done it, my first impression (which I'm surprised by) is
> that the list is too short -- I think that it is perhaps because it is
> much easier to select one option from a list than it is to decide what
> combination of options one wants.

My feeling is exactly the opposite: the having the two most prominent
options there is (if they have good names), with the "90% standard"
preselected seems simple enough; in the discussion of this bug there was
even the proposal (as I remember) to have just *one* option, which also
would not be too bad: Most people probably don't care here anyway to
select something, and just having *one* checkbox here would give room
for a detailed explanation what is going to be installed then.

Then, even the "server" would move to the "extended" selection --
servers are usually installed by more experienced users which can deal
with more options.

In any case, I would like to hear the opinion of Cyril or other d-i
people here.

Best regards

Ole