Bug#830344: Moving forward with the Project Roadmap question
On 11/08/16 at 20:17 +0200, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> 2) The TC will act as an advisor to the Roadmap Team
> 3) The TC will not be involved as body with the Roadmap Team
I'm not sure about those two options.
Would (2) go further than powers already available to the TC under
§6.1? What would it mean in practice, in terms of workflows?
Does (3) mean that the TC waives its §6.1 powers for Roadmap issues?
Wouldn't it be better to just state that:
2') the TC declines to be the Roadmap team, but will of course be
available, if necessary, under Constitution §6.1.