[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#727708: Call for Votes on init system coupling

Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes:

> I hereby call for votes on my coupling proposal and the amendments
> that have been put.

> The options on the ballot are:

>   L   Software may not depend on a specific init system
>   N   No TC resolution on this question at this time
>   A   Advice: sysvinit compatibility in jessie and multiple init support
>   FD  Further discussion

> (I have removed the proponents' names from the summary lines.)

I vote:

    N A L FD

Thanks to Ian and Colin for the work on clarifying L over the past few
weeks.  While I still don't agree with it, I at least now understand what
it means and what I would need to do with it as Policy Editor.

Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>

Attachment: pgpJr4nhci5Qn.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: