On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:41:38AM +0400, Serge Kosyrev wrote: > Serge Kosyrev <skosyrev@ptsecurity.ru> writes: > > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 19:27, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > > > I vote UDOFV. > > > So, this vote effectively gives systemd the win (assuming Bdale opts > > > for the casting vote). > > > This trumps the fact that Steve was in the midst of drafting a > > > potentially agreeable ballot all around, and had stated his > > > disappointment about this out of the blue CFV since he just needed > > > some more time to get that done. > > Many have voiced the concern I'm going to address, but as I see your > > words, I cannot help but see the need to reiterate. > > There is a point of view, that Steve's role as a debian's upstart maintainer > > is in a direct conflict with the spirit of the process here. > > From such a viewpoint, one would rather see Steve abstain from > > _any_ participation on bug #727708. > > In fact, one can't help but be amazed at the level of tolerance to this > > issue from other members of the CTTE. > Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org> writes: > > This has been repeated many times > I have said so, indeed -- as well as stated a reason for reiteration. Whether my conflict of interest in this decision constitutes a problem is a question for the Debian project to decide, not you. I have been convinced, as a result of conversations with my fellow TC members early in this process, that there was no need for me to recuse myself from the discussion. If the Debian Developers feel that my conflict of interest has resulted in a wrong decision being taken, they have the authority to override the TC with a GR. But until then, kindly stop distracting the committee from its rightful business. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature