On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I understand you think that, and I empathize, but I disagree.
The fact is, I have limited time. If I'm going to focus on making a
bigger impact with my work, I'm going to stick to dealing with issues
that effect the most users.
I don't care about the init system all that much, in the end, it's not
important. I do care about ensuring we have something maintainable and
stable.
Why bring such a controversial and polarizing issue before the TC if
the outcome doesn't matter much to you?
sysvinit is maintainable and stable, so why seek to change it?