Colin Watson <firstname.lastname@example.org> (2014-02-05): > The only people who might reasonably be described as vaguely current > maintainers of parts of d-i whom I can immediately find on a quick > scan of the early parts of this bug are Wouter and myself; Tollef also > contributed a good deal in the past, and I may have missed one or two. > But I don't think any of these people have been acting as d-i > maintainers here. People like Cyril and Christian, who would be more > obvious candidates for such a label, have not commented on this bug. I'd like to mention a few things: - TC's opinion (not d-i people's) was queried by Paul. - d-i maintainers were neither asked anything, or put in the loop at any point. - Given the incredible amount of mails on that bug, I think it's quite reasonable not to expect us to jump into that train out of the blue, especially uninvited. (I've been pointed at this subthread, I could have entirely missed it otherwise.) If you have any question for -boot@, please send a mail there. If you want some input from either Christian or me, please cc us to ensure we don't miss that mail. Mraw, KiBi.
Description: Digital signature