On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:29:09PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> The original request to us was made by Paul Tagliamonte, who I don't
> think is on the d-i team (or if he is I hope he'll forgive me for
> observing he isn't very active).
FTR - I'm not on the d-i team, and havn't been. No worries :)
> The only people who might reasonably be described as vaguely current
> maintainers of parts of d-i whom I can immediately find on a quick scan
> of the early parts of this bug are Wouter and myself; Tollef also
> contributed a good deal in the past, and I may have missed one or two.
> But I don't think any of these people have been acting as d-i
> maintainers here. People like Cyril and Christian, who would be more
> obvious candidates for such a label, have not commented on this bug.
>
> I would have thought that this is more clearly handled under 6.1(2)
> ("Decide any technical matter where Developers' jurisdictions overlap").
I agree here. I think I quoted this in a followup after I figured out my
initial mail was contentless:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=35;att=0;bug=727708
| It is requested that the tech-ctte make a decision as to the init system
| Debian shall use as the default, and make a judgement call on where the
| efforts to resolve this situation shall go (patching *around* the lack
| of systemd, or patching software to use systemd)
|
| I believe this is within the ctte's jurisdiction, given 6.1 section 2.
The TC is of course fully within it's rights to tweak under which
sections it rules.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer
: :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature