On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 10:29:09PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > The original request to us was made by Paul Tagliamonte, who I don't > think is on the d-i team (or if he is I hope he'll forgive me for > observing he isn't very active). FTR - I'm not on the d-i team, and havn't been. No worries :) > The only people who might reasonably be described as vaguely current > maintainers of parts of d-i whom I can immediately find on a quick scan > of the early parts of this bug are Wouter and myself; Tollef also > contributed a good deal in the past, and I may have missed one or two. > But I don't think any of these people have been acting as d-i > maintainers here. People like Cyril and Christian, who would be more > obvious candidates for such a label, have not commented on this bug. > > I would have thought that this is more clearly handled under 6.1(2) > ("Decide any technical matter where Developers' jurisdictions overlap"). I agree here. I think I quoted this in a followup after I figured out my initial mail was contentless: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=35;att=0;bug=727708 | It is requested that the tech-ctte make a decision as to the init system | Debian shall use as the default, and make a judgement call on where the | efforts to resolve this situation shall go (patching *around* the lack | of systemd, or patching software to use systemd) | | I believe this is within the ctte's jurisdiction, given 6.1 section 2. The TC is of course fully within it's rights to tweak under which sections it rules. Cheers, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org> | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature