Sergey B Kirpichev <skirpichev@gmail.com> writes: > I just wonder why nobody from tect-ctte take care about the exact > specification of that "bare minimum" (or, in other words, what exactly > is wrong with sysvinit). In a sense, we all have done this, even if you don't see it explicitly written in just this way. The thing that may not be obvious is that this line doesn't stand still, it is constantly moving as more people develop more free software that does newer and better things and in the process builds new dependencies. Bdale
Attachment:
pgpA0SH0WDJEE.pgp
Description: PGP signature