Bug#727708: call for votes on default Linux init system for jessie
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:13:33AM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> We might disagree on the extent, perhaps, but I doubt anyone on the
> committee would vote against this in its general form; both systemd and
> upstart implement interfaces beyond the bare minimum, though upstart
> certainly takes a more minimalist tack.
I just wonder why nobody from tect-ctte take care about the exact
specification of that "bare minimum" (or, in other words, what exactly
is wrong with sysvinit). Correct me, please, if I'm wrong.
The whole 3000+ thread is about different features of one or another
sysvinit replacement. Or do we buy the least terrible variant from the submitted?
Reply to: