[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Draft GR for advice re overruling

On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 04:11:22AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>    In the past the Technical Committee have been slow and reluctant
>    The Technical Committee's approach so far has been correct.

What's the point of mentioning "slow" above?  I don't think anyone wants
the tech-ctte (or any other Debian body, fwiw) to be slow on purpose.
That might come as a consequence of something else (e.g. reluctance),
but then you should ask for advice on that rather than on slowness.

Suggestion: drop "slow and".

Stefano Zacchiroli     zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences   ......   http://upsilon.cc/zack   ......   . . o
Debian Project Leader    .......   @zack on identi.ca   .......    o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: