[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#665851: marked as done (GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils)



Your message dated Fri, 25 May 2012 18:51:07 +0100
with message-id <20415.50827.560713.850742@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#665851: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils
has caused the Debian Bug report #665851,
regarding GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
665851: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=665851
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-ctte

For quite a while we have had a program in moreutils called
/usr/bin/parallel.  More recently, we have had a new "parallel"
program which has become a GNU project, and which for compatibility
would like to own /usr/bin/parallel.

The two programs have similar purposes.  The GNU one is more
featureful; indeed, nowadays it has an emulation mode, controllable
via an initial command line option and a configuration file, which can
make it compatible with the moreutils one.

#518696 (BCC'd) is the ITP for GNU parallel.
#597050 (BCC'd) is a request to the moreutils maintainer to
                remove moreutils's parallel.

The viable answers to the key question would appear to be:

  A.  /usr/bin/parallel should be GNU parallel.
  B.  /usr/bin/parallel should be moreutils parallel.
  C.  The two programs should Conflict.
  D.  Neither program may use this name.

Everything else will follows from one of these options.

Some might say D is forbidden by Policy and that C is mandated but
this would seem perverse given that the two programs have similar
functionality and invocation - they're not unrelated in intent, even
if they are unrelated in code.  Anyway we currently have no process
for enforcing D against a maintainer who simply fails to get around to
doing their part, so would really need a TC decision.

My view is that GNU parallel should win, particularly given that it's
a successful upstream project, being actively developed, and has
various compatibility features to ease the transition.  This is no
worse a compatibility problem than when we have switched between
different programs on previous occasions.

I would like to bring this matter to the TC.  If the committee agrees
with my preferred outcome, I think the transition would look something
like this:

  1. GNU parallel is uploaded with "Replaces: moreutils (<< CURRENT)"

  2. moreutils is uploaded with /usr/bin/parallel removed, and
     transitionally "Recommends: parallel" added (dependency strength
     to be determined by the moreutils maintainer); this may need to
     be an NMU.

Ian.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Georgios M. Zarkadas writes ("Bug#665851: Bug#597050: GNU parallel, name conflict with moreutils"):
> just FYI, GNU parallel is already in Wheezy, in a way that does not
> conflict with moreutils (cf. the last messages in Bug#518696).

Excellent, thanks.  I'm closing 665851 then.

Ian.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: