On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:18:46PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I think at least some of this should go to debian-devel-announce. I'm not
> sure if we should send the entire ruling there, or select bits and pieces
> of it, but at least the testing part probably needs to reach a broader
> audience.
>
> Do we have a past precedent for how we handle publicizing tech-ctte
> decisions?
FWIW, I'll surely mention this in my next "bits from the DPL" mail, but
it won't happen before early March. Also, I expect that when the upload
happens [1] the uploader to send a wide call for testing to d-d-a. This
is just to say that I don't think we should fear people will overlook
the practical impact of the decisions.
However, the idea of systematically announcing tech-ctte decisions to
d-d-a (hinted by your last paragraph) seems a very good one to me.
Please do :-)
Cheers.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2012/02/msg00010.html
--
Stefano Zacchiroli zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} . o .
Maître de conférences ...... http://upsilon.cc/zack ...... . . o
Debian Project Leader ....... @zack on identi.ca ....... o o o
« the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature