[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Orphan packages



>> The key point is he disagrees DFSG.

>> He said that he could continue to maintain but he disagreed DFSG so
>> he wouldn't do anything to fix license issues etc. So I and the other
>> his sponsor (jackyf) don't want to check his packages: if a maintainer
>> disagrees Debian law it is no worth to check his job.

SL> I agree with you completely!  I just don't think we need the full weight of
SL> the Tech Ctte to resolve this. :)  If you need further intervention from us,
SL> please let us know.  For my part, I expect that Alexander's orphaning will
SL> be sufficient.

Writing the first mail I understood that the list isn't fit completely
to my question, I also understood that I can orphan the list by myself,
but I didn't want to continue the conflict and wanted to solve the
problem. So I thougth that here I could find someone else who could do
that and who would have weight in Debian and I've found him :)

Thanks to Alexander, I hope that Ivan won't dare to assert a claim to
ftp-master :)

-- 

. ''`.                               Dmitry E. Oboukhov
: :’  :   email: unera@debian.org jabber://UNera@uvw.ru
`. `~’              GPGKey: 1024D / F8E26537 2006-11-21
  `- 1B23 D4F8 8EC0 D902 0555  E438 AB8C 00CF F8E2 6537

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: