Bug#510415: Call for votes on Bug#510415: tech-ctte: Qmail inclusion (or not) in Debian
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 02:34:16PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > 34215
> >
> > With 4 people ranking 3 first, and Steve ranking it second, I believe
> > the outcome is no longer in doubt, and so the CTTE has resolved that
> >
> > 3. Qmail is to be allowed in to the archive after a patch to resolve
> > the delayed bounces issue, where mail sent to an invalid recipient
> > which a reasonable MTA is capable of knowing is invalid is accepted
> > instead of being rejected at RCPT TO time. After upload, the process
> > outlined in option #2 will take effect.
> >
> > [From option #2]
> >
> > Ftpmaster should perform standard NEW processing for licensing,
> > copyright, and general packaging issues as normal. with the addition
> > of an RC bug filed immediately to preventing normal transition for a
> > period of at least a month after traversing NEW.
>
> Hi, packages are in NEW since more than one year without any comments
> from ftpmasters. I don't think that's "standard NEW processing for
> licensing, copyright, and general packaging issues as normal", isn't it?
Has the patch to fix the delayed bounces issue been applied?
Don Armstrong
--
Cheop's Law: Nothing ever gets built on schedule or within budget.
-- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p242
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: