[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#510415: Call for votes on Bug#510415: tech-ctte: Qmail inclusion (or not) in Debian



Congratulations Gerrit.  Almost there.  Thanks for your persistence.
-PeterM


On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Gerrit Pape <pape@dbnbgs.smarden.org> wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 02:34:16PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > 34215
>
> With 4 people ranking 3 first, and Steve ranking it second, I believe
> the outcome is no longer in doubt, and so the CTTE has resolved that
>
> 3. Qmail is to be allowed in to the archive after a patch to resolve
> the delayed bounces issue, where mail sent to an invalid recipient
> which a reasonable MTA is capable of knowing is invalid is accepted
> instead of being rejected at RCPT TO time. After upload, the process
> outlined in option #2 will take effect.
>
> [From option #2]
>
> Ftpmaster should perform standard NEW processing for licensing,
> copyright, and general packaging issues as normal. with the addition
> of an RC bug filed immediately to preventing normal transition for a
> period of at least a month after traversing NEW.

Hi, packages are in NEW since more than one year without any comments
from ftpmasters.  I don't think that's "standard NEW processing for
licensing, copyright, and general packaging issues as normal", isn't it?

Regards, Gerrit.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: [🔎] 20110329100009.12165.qmail@c585e02509d04c.315fe32.mid.smarden.org" target="_blank">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20110329100009.12165.qmail@c585e02509d04c.315fe32.mid.smarden.org



Reply to: