Bug#573745: Please decide on Python interpreter packages maintainership
* Sandro Tosi (morph@debian.org) [100706 00:24]:
> Ok, probably I didn't express myself clearly enough. you are talking
> about the future, when python will have co-maintainers
> (python*-default already has them), am I correct? I was referring
> instead to the current situation where python*-default has
> co-maintainers while python interpreter packages still has not. It
> seems to me that Matthias is still the key to make the architecture
> works, since he controls interpreters and co-control (horrible
> expression) the *-default, so without his ack (and so public
> discussion when needed) we are stuck.
Just checking: if pythonX.Y would have appropriate co-maintainers, you
then would be happy? Or is there more to be done as of today?
Andi
Reply to: