Re: Bug#564536: GRUB maintainer address bounces
On Mon, 18 Jan 2010, Steve Langasek wrote:
> For my part, I can't quite bring myself to argue that this warrants
> a hard policy, because as annoying as it is to receive the bounce
> mails, I think all correspondence of any importance should go via
> the BTS instead of directly to $package@packages.d.o.
I agree for the most part. If we actually need a hard policy, that
should happen first via the normal policy process, and only be brought
to the CTTE as a last resort.
Don Armstrong
--
When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall one
by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.
-- Edmund Burke "Thoughts on the Cause of Present Discontents"
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
Reply to: