Bug#535645: Wrongfull removal of ia32-libs-tools

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org) [090809 21:04]:
> The fallback would be to /assume/ they exist, and
> have each multiarch library package add Conflicts against the expected
> biarch package name; I don't accept that this is an appropriate burden to
> impose on individual library maintainers as part of the multiarch
> implementation, which should otherwise only require a small debian/rules
> change and a single Multi-Arch: yes field.

Can't that conflicts generation added in some debhelper-rule (same for
cdbs), which puts away the burden from most maintainers?



Cheers,
Andi