[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#535645: Wrongfull removal of ia32-libs-tools



On Sun, Aug 09, 2009 at 11:46:38AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:

> The specific problem here, judging from the thread, is that these tools
> create packages in the ia32-* namespace that aren't in the archive, and
> people who then install those packages on their system will have trouble
> with upgrades unless real multiarch packages add Conflicts with them?  But
> the library maintainers both don't know that they exist, and would need to
> add Conflicts on packages that have never been in the archive?

Essentially correct, yes.  The fallback would be to /assume/ they exist, and
have each multiarch library package add Conflicts against the expected
biarch package name; I don't accept that this is an appropriate burden to
impose on individual library maintainers as part of the multiarch
implementation, which should otherwise only require a small debian/rules
change and a single Multi-Arch: yes field.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek@ubuntu.com                                     vorlon@debian.org


Reply to: