On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 18:55 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > Hi, > > I'm calling on votes now for these three options (the last one isn't a > proposal, but by default in the option set). According to the > consitution, the voting periode last for up to one week, or until the > outcome is no longer in doubt. > > | 1. Keep /usr/local writeable by group staff (i.e. leave things as they > | are). > > | 2. Decide to change the default so that /usr/local is not writeable by > | group staff anymore. This change should only be implemented after an > | appropriate transition plan exists which enables system administrators > | to maintain the ability of group staff to write to /usr/local. > | (Reasons for the change are the adaption of other tools like sudo on > | most sites, and the concept of "least surprise" for novice users.) > > | 3. Further discussion. I vote 2 1 3. Bdale
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part