On Fri, Jul 24 2009, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm calling on votes now for these three options (the last one isn't a
> proposal, but by default in the option set). According to the
> consitution, the voting periode last for up to one week, or until the
> outcome is no longer in doubt.
>
> | 1. Keep /usr/local writeable by group staff (i.e. leave things as they
> | are).
>
> | 2. Decide to change the default so that /usr/local is not writeable by
> | group staff anymore. This change should only be implemented after an
> | appropriate transition plan exists which enables system administrators
> | to maintain the ability of group staff to write to /usr/local.
> | (Reasons for the change are the adaption of other tools like sudo on
> | most sites, and the concept of "least surprise" for novice users.)
>
> | 3. Further discussion.
>
I vote:
2, 1, 3
manoj
--
"If you don't stand for something, you'll fall for everything." Jeff
Stiles, Southern Baptist preacher
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Attachment:
pgpSBNajO_ekK.pgp
Description: PGP signature