Re: Call for Votes (Re: mixmaster /etc/default/*)

To: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Call for Votes (Re: mixmaster /etc/default/*)
From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:55:15 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20071206195515.GI30144@mails.so.argh.org>
Mail-followup-to: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>, debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 18264.18569.954579.131884@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>
References: <[🔎] 18257.42753.999750.367537@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 18259.11794.946342.985863@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk> <[🔎] 20071206122010.GG30144@mails.so.argh.org> <[🔎] 18264.18569.954579.131884@davenant.relativity.greenend.org.uk>

* Ian Jackson (ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk) [071206 20:08]:
> For the avoidance of any doubt, I don't think that decisions of the TC
> should be interpreted as overruling the maintainer unless that is the
> only possible interpretation of the resolution's text.
> 
> In the past it has always been clearly stated if we intend to overrule
> the maintainer.  We should continue that practice.

Good that we agree. :)


Cheers,
Andi
-- 
  http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/

Reply to:

References:
- mixmaster /etc/default/*
  - From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Call for Votes (Re: mixmaster /etc/default/*)
  - From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>
- Re: Call for Votes (Re: mixmaster /etc/default/*)
  - From: Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>
- Re: Call for Votes (Re: mixmaster /etc/default/*)
  - From: Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Call for Votes (getaddrinfo)
Next by Date: RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not apply
Previous by thread: Re: Call for Votes (Re: mixmaster /etc/default/*)
Next by thread: Re: mixmaster /etc/default/*
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread