Re: Call for Votes (Re: glibc's getaddrinfo() sort order)
Ian Jackson writes ("Call for Votes (Re: glibc's getaddrinfo() sort order)"):
> -8<-
>
> 1. RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not be applied to IPv4 addresses
> by Debian systems, and we overrule the maintainer. If the
> maintainer has not uploaded a suitable change within 1
> week, Ian Jackson is mandated to make an NMU in sid.
> 2. RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not be applied to IPv6 addresses
> by Debian systems. However, we do not overrule the maintainer
> on this point and we do not authorise changing it via an NMU.
> 3. We recommend to the IETF that RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should be
> abolished, definitely for IPv4, and probably for IPv6 too.
>
> -8<-
And here's my vote
> -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> [1] Choice X: Do not use rule 9, overrule maintainer, etc., as above.
> [2] Choice F: Further discussion
> [3] Choice S: Sort IPv4 addrs according to rule 9 in getaddrinfo
> -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Ian.
Reply to: