On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 22:08:13 +1000, Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> said:
> On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:58:57AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
>> "Every package in contrib must comply with the DFSG ... Examples of
>> packages which would be included in contrib are: ... wrapper
>> packages or other sorts of free accessories for non-free programs."
>> It seems clear to me that ndiswrapper fits this policy rather
>> exactly.
> I disagree with you on that -- I still think "providing a compatable
> interface" is the best way to look at this, as per:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2006/03/msg00037.html
i like this proposal as well.
manoj
--
"Whenever 'A' attempts by law to impose his moral standards upon 'B',
'A' is most likely a scoundrel." - H. L. Mencken
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Attachment:
pgpwf0RbyYGPy.pgp
Description: PGP signature