Bug#367709: requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images based on d-i technology (but not d-i).
* Steve Langasek (firstname.lastname@example.org) [060605 20:14]:
> On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:42:21AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Steve Langasek (email@example.com) [060604 23:24]:
> > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 06:45:55PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > So, I propose the following conclusions from us:
> > > Hmm, in Mexico we discussed that this bug was out of order for the TC to
> > > consider. Why do we not just punt the bug over to the responsibles?
> > > (ftp.debian.org? libstdc++?)
> > because we thaught the maintainers didn't decide yet. We learned on
> > Sunday however that the maintainers did decide about a udeb in the d-i
> > section - and the answer was no (for obvious reasons).
> Hmm, who's "we"? And I guess you mean that the d-i maintainers decided they
> didn't want this, not that the gcc maintainer decided it would not be
"we" = "the people at the Indian cooking"
the gcc maintainers decided that they will add it only when the d-i
maintainers need it, and the d-i maintainer decided to not need it.
Actually, even Sven doesn't want it for d-i, so he asks us to overwrite
the decision of the gcc maintainers.