[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#367709: requesting libstdc++ .udeb in order to produce c++ based images based on d-i technology (but not d-i).

On Mon, Jun 05, 2006 at 10:42:21AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Steve Langasek (vorlon@debian.org) [060604 23:24]:
> > On Sun, Jun 04, 2006 at 06:45:55PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > So, I propose the following conclusions from us:

> > Hmm, in Mexico we discussed that this bug was out of order for the TC to
> > consider.  Why do we not just punt the bug over to the responsibles? 
> > (ftp.debian.org?  libstdc++?)

> because we thaught the maintainers didn't decide yet. We learned on
> Sunday however that the maintainers did decide about a udeb in the d-i
> section - and the answer was no (for obvious reasons).

Hmm, who's "we"?  And I guess you mean that the d-i maintainers decided they
didn't want this, not that the gcc maintainer decided it would not be

Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: