Re: building packages for sparc
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 11:04:47AM +0000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Debian buildds. So just "doctoring" around a failure on a buildd by
> > building it in a different environment is not healthy in the long run
> > because we need to make sure that the buildd is capable of building
> > every package.
On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 12:21:59PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> I guess it's a good thing that we don't have maintainers building and
> uploading every single package in the archive (for at least one
> architecture) built in random environments, then.
> Oh wait, we do. Damn.
Do you have some reason to think that this is a problem?
I mean, other than the <<we rely on buildd to deal with architectures
where we have only one kernel and where we don't have maintainers spending
much time>> thing that underlies your sarcasm?