On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 12:07:06PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > can someone explain me what the committee is waiting for ? It's probably not the "explanation" you're looking for, but you're insane if you expect to get an efficient resultoution of a contentious issue by committee . > 3. Gnome2 in an external repository until most of the people are happy > with Gnome2 > I've put the 3 initial choices, but you should know that Jeff Waugh > doesn't support the second solution anymore but the third one. So how about we just get on with the job of implementing method (3)? Is there anyone who thinks that would be a bad solution, even if it mightn't be the best one? If not, then is there any reason to wait for an official stamp of approval, or can we (heh) just get on with it? I (as someone reasonably familiar with the archive and the tools for maintaining it) would suggest you grab the scripts Brendan (firstname.lastname@example.org) used for the perl staging area and set that up in people.d.o/~hertzog as the most effective way of getting this going. Cheers, aj  "especially the tech-ctte" or "even the tech-ctte", your choice. -- Anthony Towns <email@example.com> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Description: PGP signature