Bug#154950: Thoughts on GNOME 2 transition
<quote who="Raphael Hertzog">
> Le Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 08:28:15PM +1000, Jeff Waugh ?crivait:
> > > The only real question is : do we prepare Gnome2 in unstable, in
> > > experimental or in a separate staging area.
> > In addition to your pros/cons, if it were done in unstable, it should be
> > with *2 names. That has pros and cons in itself. :-)
> Well, when I said "in unstable", I meant without the *2 names. :-)
> (because imho it's a perfectly reasonable solution)
That, indeed, is the crux of the argument. We don't want to put stuff
without *2 in unstable because it means no one has an option whilst we
perfect the migration stuff. That's why we mostly settled on maintaining it
all outside unstable during the meeting, despite the inefficiencies.
> But we'll not start the discussion once again. I'll leave it to the
> technical comittee, that's why he was questionned.
Hunch, n.: U.S. Foreign Policy.