[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Procedure for submitting requests for clarification to the committee

>>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net> writes:

 Dale> On 30 Jul 1999, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
 >>  Raul> Which reminds me, your suggestion about a committee for
 >> Raul> approving

        You missed out this line. 

 Raul> the submission of proposals to the technical committee seems to
 Raul> conflict with 6.1.3 of the constitution:
 Raul> Any person or body may delegate a decision of their own to the
 Raul> Technical Committee, or seek advice from it.
 >> WHAT? WHERE the HECK did you get that from? Quote me chapter

 Dale> He just did!

        I should be more minimalistic in my quoting. I realize that by
 quoting the whole paragraph, the runt of my objection, and the object
 of my objection, was misdirected, and the misinterpretation was quite

        I still want to know when I said: "a committee fora pproving
 the submission of proposals to the technical committee" 

 "I don't know what their gripe is.  A critic is simply someone paid
 to render opinions glibly." "Critics are grinks and groinks."  Baron
 and Badger, from Badger comics
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E

Reply to: