Re: Procedure for submitting requests for clarification to the committee
>>"Dale" == Dale Scheetz <email@example.com> writes:
Dale> On 30 Jul 1999, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> Raul> Which reminds me, your suggestion about a committee for
>> Raul> approving
You missed out this line.
Raul> the submission of proposals to the technical committee seems to
Raul> conflict with 6.1.3 of the constitution:
Raul> Any person or body may delegate a decision of their own to the
Raul> Technical Committee, or seek advice from it.
>> WHAT? WHERE the HECK did you get that from? Quote me chapter
Dale> He just did!
I should be more minimalistic in my quoting. I realize that by
quoting the whole paragraph, the runt of my objection, and the object
of my objection, was misdirected, and the misinterpretation was quite
I still want to know when I said: "a committee fora pproving
the submission of proposals to the technical committee"
"I don't know what their gripe is. A critic is simply someone paid
to render opinions glibly." "Critics are grinks and groinks." Baron
and Badger, from Badger comics
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E